Writing Off “Those Kids”

Excellent post from Parenting the Core:

Sarah Blaine / Parenting the Core's avatarparentingthecore

Just curious… does anyone else find this New York Times “Room For Debate” pieceby Michael Petrilli, president of The Thomas B. Fordham Institute, which ran under the headline “Charters Can Do What’s Best For Students Who Care,” as breathtakingly offensive as I do? What boggles my mind is that this man is a leading voice among the so-called education reformers. His honesty is, at least, honest, I suppose. Unlike the DFERs, at least he’s not out there shouting that access to charter schools is the new civil rights movement of our time. He’s not out there suggesting that charter schools don’t cherry-pick and weed out students. So there’s that. I guess.

Instead, Petrilli’s saying that the fact that tax-dollar-funded charter schools kick out large numbers of students is “a feature, not a bug.” And that when it comes to discipline, “[t]raditional public schools that serve all…

View original post 1,180 more words

Stopping the Corporate Raid on America’s Public Schools: Local Control Over Education

Britt Dickerson wrote an insightful essay entitled “Investors Ready to Liquidate Public Schools” about the corporate raid on America’s public schools.  Dickerson writes:

“Plans are under way for investment corporations to execute the biggest conversion – some call it theft – of public schools property in U.S. history.

That is not hyperbole. Investment bankers themselves estimate that their taking over public schools is going to result in hundreds of billions of dollars in profit, if they can pull it off.”

Much has been written about the free market corporate plans to cash in on the public dollars associated with RTTT policies and the exploitation of children as profit producing capital.  However, less has been written about how to stop the freight train loaded with venture capitalists hell-bent on reaching the destination of a totally unfettered free market of education in the U.S.

Dickerson succinctly distills the solution.   Who has the power to stop the corporate raiders?

  1. Educators, parents, and concerned community members who “rally to maintain local, democratic control of public schools” … who understand that “any degree of standardization that comes from beyond the state only serves large, nation-wide investor interests.”
  2. Educators who “successfully counter the investor propaganda that parents are the only true stakeholders in a child’s education.” Only “then raiders can be opposed successfully. The oldest to the youngest and richest to poorest members of every community are the true stakeholders in public schools and public education.”
  3. Democratically elected school boards that “stay empowered to make decisions for the local public schools,” … able to resist the raider process.”
  4. Stakeholders who “successfully press legislators to listen to them instead of paid, professional lobbyists hired by large, investor-owned charter corporations… .”

The total destruction of our nation’s public school system is predicated on the elimination of local control over public schools.  Lou Gerstner, former CEO of IBM and current advisor to the Carlyle Group, who served as a chief architect of systemic education reform in the 90s, understood the need to wrestle control away from local school boards in order to push forward free market corporate education reforms.  Gerstner’s legacy among corporate education reformers was cemented in 1996 when he brought together the corporate world with state governors at the IBM headquarters in Palisades to establish the education reform agenda for the nation.  This meeting brought us Achieve — the organization that is credited with the development of the Common Core standards.  In 2008, Gerstner summarized what he had learned over the years as a leading voice in education reform for the The Wall Street Journal.  One of his recommendations addressed the issue of local control over public schools:

Abolish all local school districts, save 70 (50 states; 20 largest cities). Some states may choose to leave some of the rest as community service organizations, but they would have no direct involvement in the critical task of establishing standards, selecting teachers, and developing curricula.”


Need I say more?

Follow me on Twitter:  and Facebook.

 

The NAACP’s Proud Tradition of Advocating for all Children — Charter Schools are not the Solution

Just a reminder of the NAACP’s position on Charter Schools.  Good charter schools only serve only a small percentage of children, they are proving to be a tool for segregation, and they divert needed funds from public schools.  Today’s charter school movement is far removed from the original notion that they could be a source of innovation.

“The NAACP rejects the emphasis on charter schools as the vanguard approach for the education of children, instead of focusing attention, funding, and policy advocacy on improving existing, low performing public schools and will work through local, state and federal legislative processes to ensure that all public schools are provided the necessary funding, support and autonomy necessary to educate all students.”

http://nepc.colorado.edu/blog/naacp-resolution-charter-schools

The NAACP fully supports public schools.

“That Kid”

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet/wp/2014/11/14/teacher-to-parents-about-that-kid-the-one-who-hits-disrupts-and-influences-your-kid/?Post+generic=%3Ftid%3Dsm_twitter_washingtonpost

If Valerie Strauss’ story doesn’t touch your heart, nothing will.  I’m a mom to one of “those kids.”  He’s 24 now.  He’s brilliant.  But we had some dark days and I finally home schooled him after the 8th grade.  He has Asperger’s Syndrome.  I love him dearly.  He’s in college now and doing very well.  Thank you, Valerie Strauss for sharing this.  I couldn’t help but cry when I read your article.

I’ve been on both sides of the teacher desk.  I’ve been a teacher to “those kids.”   And I’ve been the mom of “that kid.”

Teachers are special.  Whether they teach young kids or older kids, they are special.  Elementary teachers care for those children who throw temper tantrums, are angry, or just can’t get along in the classroom.  High school teachers care for students who are pregnant, have run-ins with the law, and/or are grappling with very grown-up issues.

And parents seek solace and understanding.  Our dreams for our children are fragile at times.  We seek Providence in dark days.

Thank you, Valerie Strauss.  Your article means more than you’ll ever know.

Deb